\nThe Prince of Wales and the Mayor of London are named in a high court case launched by UK developers Nick and Christian Candy against Qatari Diar Real Estate company over the controversial Chelsea Barracks project.\n<\/p>\n
\nThe brother\u2019s development company, CPC Group, has lodged a claim for breach of contract against the Middle East company after it withdrew its plans for the \u00a33 billion residential scheme following criticism from Prince Charles and others.\n<\/p>\n
\nQatari Diar, a property company backed by the emirate of Qatar, and a long time business partner of the UK developers dropped the planning application in June this year, four months after Prince Charles wrote a letter to Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al Thani, chairman of Qatari Diar and prime minister and foreign minister of Qatar.\n<\/p>\n
\nIn it he described it as too dense and too modern for such an historic site.\n<\/p>\n
\nNow the first arguments have been launched at a pre-trial hearing in the High Court in London.
\nLord Grabiner QC, representing the Candy brothers, said the court case could be avoided if Qatari Diar honoured a clause in the contract and paid out \u00a368.5 million in compensation.\n<\/p>\n
\n\u2018Whatever happened at Qatari Diar, they know what impact that letter had on their behavior and what they did,\u2019 he told the court.
\nHe added that he did not expect to call Prince Charles or Boris Johnson, London’s mayor, as witnesses.
\nBut it might be necessary to investigate what happened at Qatari Diar following the prince’s letter.\n<\/p>\n
\nUnder the alleged terms of the contract, Lord Grabiner said, the application could be withdrawn only under certain conditions, including a planning refusal by Westminster city council or an indication from Mr Johnson that he would refuse the application.\n<\/p>\n
\nLord Grabiner pointed out that, when the application was withdrawn, Westminster city council had not met to decide on it, nor had the mayor called it in.\n<\/p>\n
\nThe issue was whether the mayor had indicated that he intended to exercise his powers. \u2018We say that this never happened. This will be the key point in the trial,\u2019 he said.\n<\/p>\n
\nQatari Diar will argue that it was entitled to withdraw the planning application because the Mayor for London was going to direct Westminster Council to refuse the scheme.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\nThe Prince of Wales and the Mayor of London are named in a high court case launched by UK developers Nick and Christian Candy against Qatari<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"persona":[],"class_list":["post-3067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n