In my view, a decade ago and most probably the next to come, discussions on 'convenience vs quality' of life in and around Capital, options would boil down to three of the biggest entities/developers (i.e., CDA, BT, DHA, MPCHS somehow - with a resurgence of B-17).
Modus Operandi could be different, variables here and there but ultimate outcomes would remain same
As far as immediate living and benefits
- Rental value, Accessibility to mainstream Official, Educational, Health institutes CDA sectors in particular G, I (some chunks of E) is the way to go, in relative terms.
- Quality of life, Better value of money would give an edge to BTs and DHAs every single time.
There can be exceptions such as I-8, D-12, BT 1/2 etc (higher price tags).
Rental Value, commute, lighter tag = E-11, I-9/I-10, G-9/10/11 (may be D too)etc.
Investment = E-12, I-14/15/16, I-12 (attractive but longer term)
Better Access, Concentrated Value, Rental = BT 1 to 4
Investment and Future Potential = BT 7, BT 8 (in particular)
One can equate a few variables here and there in the equation but approximate results will remain same.
684 days ago